Difference Between WhatsMiner M63 and X16-Q

Model

WhatsMiner M63

Brand MicroBT
Hashrate 334-374 Th
Algorithm SHA-256
Efficiency 19.9 j/Th
Release date November 2023
Cooling Hydro

Calculation for 374Th

Profit per day

14.58 USDT

≈ 1,203.23 ₽

Payback

Power 7442.6 W
Ads count 8
The best price 2000 USDT

X16-Q

Brand Jasminer
Hashrate 1.95Gh
Algorithm Etchash
Efficiency 317.9 j/Gh
Release date May 2023
Cooling Air

Calculation for 1.95Gh

Profit per day

1.10 USDT

≈ 90.64 ₽

Payback

Power 619.905 W
Ads count 4
The best price 245 USDT

Conclusion

The choice between MicroBT WhatsMiner M63 and Jasminer X16-Q is a classic dilemma for mining investors. WhatsMiner M63 and X16-Q cannot be directly compared by hashrate as they operate on different protocols: SHA-256 and Etchash respectively. Choose the right WhatsMiner M63 version for your needs from 21 options with power ranging from 334Th to 374Th inclusive. Jasminer X16-Q is released in a single version with 1.95Gh. The power consumption of MicroBT WhatsMiner M63 374Th is 7442.6 Watts. Jasminer X16-Q 1.95Gh, in turn, consumes 619.905 Watts. Miner WhatsMiner M63 (Hydro) will significantly differ in noise level from X16-Q (Air). 8 active listings available for MicroBT WhatsMiner M63. The best price-to-performance ratio: 372Th for 1991 USDT. Our platform has 4 offers of Jasminer X16-Q from different companies, available both in stock and on order. The best price for the 1.95Gh version is currently 245 USDT.