Difference Between BM-K1 and WhatsMiner M30S++

Model

BM-K1

Brand iBeLink
Hashrate 5.3Th
Algorithm Blake (2s-Kadena)
Efficiency 157.5 j/Th
Release date November 2020
Cooling Air

Calculation for 5.3Th

Profit per day

0.15 USDT

≈ 12.47 ₽

Payback

Power 834.75 W

WhatsMiner M30S++

Brand MicroBT
Hashrate 100-112 Th
Algorithm SHA-256
Efficiency 31 j/Th
Release date October 2020
Cooling Air

Calculation for 112Th

Profit per day

4.51 USDT

≈ 375.67 ₽

Payback

Power 3472 W
Ads count 10
The best price 13000 RUB

Conclusion

Let's compare how relevant BM-K1 is compared to WhatsMiner M30S++ in current conditions. BM-K1 and WhatsMiner M30S++ cannot be directly compared by hashrate as they operate on different protocols: Blake (2s-Kadena) and SHA-256 respectively. Model iBeLink BM-K1 is presented exclusively in a configuration with 5.3Th, other power options are not provided for this series. The MicroBT WhatsMiner M30S++ lineup includes 7 modifications: starting performance is 100Th, while top solutions reach 112Th. The power consumption of iBeLink BM-K1 5.3Th is 834.75 Watts. MicroBT WhatsMiner M30S++ 112Th, in turn, consumes 3472 Watts. The cooling type for both models is identical — classic fan airflow. Offers for iBeLink BM-K1 are temporarily unavailable, but our catalog contains many other profitable models. Compare 10 offers for MicroBT WhatsMiner M30S++ from verified suppliers. Right now, the 102Th configuration can be purchased at the minimum price of 9800 RUB.