AE-BOX II
- Brand Goldshell
- Hashrate 54Mh
- Algorithm zkSNARK
- Efficiency 9.8 j/Mh
- Release date March 2025
- Cooling Air
Calculation for 54Mh
≈ 24.83 ₽
- Power 529.2 W
ALEO AE3
- Brand IceRiver
- Hashrate 2Gh
- Algorithm zkSNARK
- Efficiency 1700 j/Gh
- Release date November 2025
- Cooling Air
Calculation for 2Gh
≈ 919.63 ₽
- Power 3400 W
Conclusion
Today in the battle we have AE-BOX II from Goldshell against competitor IceRiver's ALEO AE3. Both devices operate on zkSNARK, mining ALEO. The main profit focus is currently on ALEO. Model AE-BOX II from manufacturer Goldshell is a unique solution with 54Mh power, available in a single version. Model ALEO AE3 from manufacturer IceRiver is a unique solution with 2Gh power, available in a single version. The difference in computing power is 97.3%, but the final advantage can only be shown by the energy efficiency of the equipment. Model AE-BOX II has 9.8 j/Mh, while ALEO AE3 has 1700 j/Gh. Model AE-BOX II 54Mh has a power consumption of 529.2 Watts, while ALEO AE3 2Gh consumes 3400 Watts. Both miners use air cooling, which requires good room ventilation. Unfortunately, AE-BOX II is currently not available either in stock or on order. Please try looking at other models. Compare 1 offers for IceRiver ALEO AE3 from verified suppliers. Right now, the 2Gh configuration can be purchased at the minimum price of \"Price on request\".